Fwd: [tinderbox-cvs] addport and -r

Ade Lovett ade at FreeBSD.org
Wed Sep 7 00:41:49 EDT 2005


Oops.  Let's try that one again, eh? :)

-aDe

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Ade Lovett <ade at freebsd.org>
> Date: September 06, 2005 21:21:44  PDT
> To: tinderbox-cvs at marcuscom.com
> Subject: [tinderbox-cvs] addport and -r
>
>
> In a tinderbox environment, is there any reason why someone would  
> *not* want to specific -r (recursive) to addPort when it comes to  
> building things?
>
> Since dependencies would get (re)built anyway, I'm trying to  
> understand where there would be a reason for all the niceties of -r  
> (status of package building etc) not to be incorporated into the  
> tinderbuild process.
>
> Essentially, I'd like to deprecate addPort -r, making it a null- 
> operation, with removal on or around 3.0, unless there are  
> compelling reasons not to do so.
>
> -aDe
>
> _______________________________________________
> tinderbox-cvs at marcuscom.com mailing list
> http://marcuscom.com/mailman/listinfo/tinderbox-cvs
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "tinderbox-cvs- 
> unsubscribe at marcuscom.com"
>
>



More information about the tinderbox-list mailing list