Fwd: [tinderbox-cvs] addport and -r
Ade Lovett
ade at FreeBSD.org
Wed Sep 7 00:41:49 EDT 2005
Oops. Let's try that one again, eh? :)
-aDe
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Ade Lovett <ade at freebsd.org>
> Date: September 06, 2005 21:21:44 PDT
> To: tinderbox-cvs at marcuscom.com
> Subject: [tinderbox-cvs] addport and -r
>
>
> In a tinderbox environment, is there any reason why someone would
> *not* want to specific -r (recursive) to addPort when it comes to
> building things?
>
> Since dependencies would get (re)built anyway, I'm trying to
> understand where there would be a reason for all the niceties of -r
> (status of package building etc) not to be incorporated into the
> tinderbuild process.
>
> Essentially, I'd like to deprecate addPort -r, making it a null-
> operation, with removal on or around 3.0, unless there are
> compelling reasons not to do so.
>
> -aDe
>
> _______________________________________________
> tinderbox-cvs at marcuscom.com mailing list
> http://marcuscom.com/mailman/listinfo/tinderbox-cvs
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "tinderbox-cvs-
> unsubscribe at marcuscom.com"
>
>
More information about the tinderbox-list
mailing list