Preparing for 2.3.3

[Florent Thoumie]

On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 00:32 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> I'd like to release 2.3.3 as there are quite a few bug fixes in CVS
> right now.  However, someone was mentioning a problem concerning
> PORTREVISION on IRC the other day, and I can't remember who, or which
> port exhibited the problem.  If there is a known issue outstanding that
> should be addressed in a bug fix release, I'd like to know about it.
> Thanks.

It might be a problem on my end.

Basically, I have a variable called LOCALREVISION that i use instead of
PORTREVISION in my experimental tree, and keep PORTREVISION equal to the
value in the original ports tree + 1. In bsd.xorg.mk i do something like

.if defined(LOCALREVISION)
PORTREVISION= ${LOCALREVISION}
.endif

... which gives:

$ make LOCALREVISION=1 -V PORTREVISION
1

... but in tinderbox, it doesn't seem to work (ie. no PORTREVISION set
and LOCALREVISION set to 1 -> PORTREVISION unset).

-- 
Florent Thoumie
flz at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Committer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://marcuscom.com/pipermail/tinderbox-list/attachments/20061028/97f64575/attachment.bin