Preparing for 2.3.3

[Joe Marcus Clarke]

On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 00:25 +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 00:32 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > I'd like to release 2.3.3 as there are quite a few bug fixes in CVS
> > right now.  However, someone was mentioning a problem concerning
> > PORTREVISION on IRC the other day, and I can't remember who, or which
> > port exhibited the problem.  If there is a known issue outstanding that
> > should be addressed in a bug fix release, I'd like to know about it.
> > Thanks.
> 
> It might be a problem on my end.
> 
> Basically, I have a variable called LOCALREVISION that i use instead of
> PORTREVISION in my experimental tree, and keep PORTREVISION equal to the
> value in the original ports tree + 1. In bsd.xorg.mk i do something like
> 
> .if defined(LOCALREVISION)
> PORTREVISION= ${LOCALREVISION}
> .endif
> 
> ... which gives:
> 
> $ make LOCALREVISION=1 -V PORTREVISION
> 1
> 
> ... but in tinderbox, it doesn't seem to work (ie. no PORTREVISION set
> and LOCALREVISION set to 1 -> PORTREVISION unset).

Tinderbox uses PKGNAME to get the package name plus version.  What does:

make LOCALREVISION=1 -V PKGNAME

Give you?

Joe

-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://marcuscom.com/pipermail/tinderbox-list/attachments/20061027/7277698e/attachment.bin