packaging: python + EGG
Joe Marcus Clarke
marcus at marcuscom.com
Mon Jun 4 11:42:36 EDT 2007
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 10:29 +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Robert Gogolok píše v po 04. 06. 2007 v 08:58 +0200:
> > What is the issue with building python ports that use egg in a tinderbox?
> > I'm seeing some comments in the commit message that 'uname' is the evil.
> > py-lxml and py-cheetah in a tinderbox:
> > http://w5.cs.uni-sb.de/~gogo/screenshots/ports/py24-lxml-1.2.1.log
> > http://w5.cs.uni-sb.de/~gogo/screenshots/ports/py24-cheetah-2.0.r7.log
> The problem is that 'uname' is the evil. You have different version of
> FreeBSD inside the Tinderbox than what's the host system running, right?
> This is currently broken with Python eggs. I hope Alex will be able to
> fix this soon, somehow.
I think there was a patch to uname recently to fix this.
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://marcuscom.com/pipermail/tinderbox-list/attachments/20070604/22e45f64/attachment.bin
More information about the tinderbox-list