Building python modules with a non-default version

[Joe Marcus Clarke]

On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 13:23 -0300, Alejandro Pulver wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:49:05 -0400
> Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus at marcuscom.com> wrote:
> 
> > > > > I see both 2.4 and 2.5 modules are listed.
> > > > 
> > > > Something is wrong with your portstree, then.  I only see the 2.4
> > > > versions listed:
> > > > 
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > First, thank you for your help so far.
> > > 
> > > I've extracted the portstree from scratch with 'portsnap extract' and
> > > the same happens. Also the same happens with the portstree from my
> > > machine in general. What else can I try?
> > 
> > While your local environment can affect the package-depends-list, that
> > environment should not be affecting Tinderbox.  If there is something
> > bleeding into Tinderbox, that is a problem.  Try running the
> > package-depends-list command first with a clean environment, then
> > without a make.conf file, and see if either of those are causing the bad
> > dependency list.  I cannot reproduce this problem.
> > 
> 
> If I mount the ports tree to the Tinderbox's FreeBSD 6 jail, 'chroot'
> there and run the command, it works as expected. Tried with a clean
> environment and without make.conf, but makes no difference. It seems
> there is something wrong with my system, but it shouldn't affect
> Tinderbox as demonstrated by my previous statement.

But Tinderbox generates the Makefile outside of the chroot Jail.
Nothing on the host should affect that, though.  Do you have a
jails/JAIL/make.conf file?

Joe

-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://marcuscom.com/pipermail/tinderbox-list/attachments/20071001/0f94c642/attachment.bin