"Hosts" within tinderbox?

[Erwin Lansing]

On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:01:42AM -0700, Ade Lovett wrote:
> Does anyone actually use the "Hosts" table within the tinderbox code  
> for per-host configuration items?
> 
> Particularly given this snippet from the README:
> 
> Creating Hosts:
> ---------------
> 
> XXX: stuff needs to go in here.
> 
> 
> I'm wondering if it's used at all.  A considerable amount of code  
> could be cleaned up if this were to go away.
> 
I don't think this is widely used, if at all.  I tried to use it for the
shared tinderboxes, but failed miserably (I can't remember the details,
might have been something with different src trees on different
architectures), so I ended up having two indepedent webinterfaces, only
the portstrees/ directory is shared.  It would be a great feature if it
was fixed though :-)

-erwin

-- 
Erwin Lansing                                     http://droso.org
Security is like an onion.          (o_ _o)
It's made up of several layers   \\\_\   /_///
And it makes you cry.            <____) (____>    erwin at lansing.dk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://marcuscom.com/pipermail/tinderbox-list/attachments/20071006/f04feeea/attachment.bin