"Hosts" within tinderbox?

[Ade Lovett]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Oct 07, 2007, at 01:05 , Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> That said, do as you like, but in the end, it would be nice to have at
> least the current feature set of `tinderd' back.

tinderd is alive and well in HEAD, I put that code back some time ago.

My question here is one of whether anyone actually uses, in the  
limited sense provided, the per-host configuration provided by the  
Hosts table (and code thereof).

What I'm trying to do here is to get a decent feature-complete set  
codebase for tinderbox (as it currently stands) based on HEAD, which  
eventually becomes 3.0, Depleted Uranium, or whatever, with all of  
the constraints that it is currently under.

Once we have *that*, then we can sit down and whiteboard what we want  
to achieve with tinderboxes in general (and I'd personally like to  
see singleton tinderboxes running roughly the same code as the  
package building cluster, so a combination of the two systems), and  
go for tinderbox:NG.

- -aDe

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFHCJT5pXS8U0IvffwRAmr1AJ99ijmmdVdkmwjtXWem4imK9HQaEQCgmUGI
hCNR9sB4YWIgXuWtUS2rcuQ=
=GLzx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----