"Hosts" within tinderbox?

[Ade Lovett]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Oct 07, 2007, at 01:18 , Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> But the hosts table is needed for several tinderd instances on several
> machines, no?
> I have used that in the past.

Well, that's the whole point of this thread :)

Is the "Hosts" table actually used.

If it is, then fine, no worries, one less thing to worry about.

The meta-issue is that the current tinderbox code is ill-suited to  
multiple host management.  So, I'd like to get to a point where  
tinderbox as we know and love it is unbranched, a new release is made  
(whether that's 2.6 via repo magic, or 3.0 and then chunking  
TINDERBOX_2_X doesn't matter at this point).

Then we move on.  Sit down.  Figure out what we want from both an  
individual user tinderbox perspective, but also looking at the  
requirements of a full package-build cluster.

Heck, maybe I'll even turn up in person somewhere to write on the  
whiteboard :)

- -aDe

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFHCJjupXS8U0IvffwRAqC9AKCacN1TaXfq+Ba16tHh0v6NTNHtFACdFdhb
5m8P3q6oSRq7HzuQw7Mfwc4=
=uCmt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----