port not built but no error logged

Ion-Mihai Tetcu itetcu at people.tecnik93.com
Fri Feb 3 04:21:25 EST 2006


On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:33:12 -0500
Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus at marcuscom.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 02:22 +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 19:10:27 -0500
> > Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus at marcuscom.com> wrote:

 [ ... ]

> > root(itetcu)@kira/T >-SSH-> /var/tinderbox [2:17:58] 0
> >  # ./scripts/tc addPort -b 4-myPT -d mail/dspam-devel
> > nullfs: /var/tinderbox/portstrees/myPT/ports (/var/tinderbox/portstrees/myPT/ports) and /var/tinderbox/portstrees/myPT/ports are not distinct paths
> > nullfs: /var/tinderbox/jails/4 (/var/tinderbox/jails/4) and /var/tinderbox/jails/4/src are not distinct paths
> > root(itetcu)@kira/T >-SSH-> /var/tinderbox [2:18:10] 0
> >  # ./scripts/tinderbuild -b 4-myPT mail/dspam-devel
> > nullfs: /var/tinderbox/portstrees/myPT/ports (/var/tinderbox/portstrees/myPT/ports) and /var/tinderbox/portstrees/myPT/ports are not distinct paths
> > nullfs: /var/tinderbox/jails/4 (/var/tinderbox/jails/4) and /var/tinderbox/jails/4/src are not distinct paths
> > INFO: Creating build directory for 4-myPT from repository...
> > ================================================
> > building packages (phase 1)
> > ================================================
> > started at Fri Feb  3 02:20:16 EET 2006
> > ended at Fri Feb  3 02:20:16 EET 2006
> > phase 1 took 00:00:00
> > 207 packages built
> > 645M  of packages
> > ================================================
> > building packages (phase 2)
> > ================================================
> > started at Fri Feb  3 02:20:16 EET 2006
> > ended at Fri Feb  3 02:20:16 EET 2006
> > phase 2 took 00:00:00
> > 207 packages built
> > 645M  of packages
> >  
> > > Your links above are broken, so I can't verify if the Makefile was
> > > generated correctly.
> > 
> > I'm sorry:
> > http://people.tecnik93.com/~itetcu/FreeBSD/errors/
> 
> I'm not certain those nullfs errors are a good thing.  I use nullfs on
> one of my servers, and I never see them.  

The is a 5.4-STABLE #0: Tue Jan 10 23:41:20 EET 2006 and being a
semi-production machine I'm reluctant to upgrade it to 6 because on
similar hardware with SATA disks I'm seeing a lot of TIMEOUT -
READ_DMA ...; however I was told on#bsdports that they can be safely
ignored and I didn't seem to have any problem since I started using
tinderbox, a few weeks ago.

> Additionally, do you have packages for dspam-3.6.3.tgz in your packages
> directory for 4-myPT?

That one yes. However I don't have dspam-devel-3.6.3.tgz (this
corresponds to the version from Ports, nor the one corresponding to
this failed build), but the build log for dspam-devel-3.6.3 looks fine
to me, including package creation (both logs uploaded in the same
place); except the name, dspam and dspam-devel ports in the Tree are
_identical_ now.


-- 
IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

Blast medicine anyway!  We've learned to tie into every organ in the
human body but one.  The brain!  The brain is what life is all about.
		-- McCoy, "The Menagerie", stardate 3012.4




More information about the tinderbox-list mailing list